Glaucoma/EMR Index
Richard Hom twitter updates
Other neat sites

Powered by Squarespace
West Coast Glaucoma Centre
Member sign-in
Search
Related links
« When should an optometrist refer a patient for glaucoma? | Main | Building trust between Optometrists & Ophthalmologists for patient care »
Thursday
01Oct2009

What do optometrists do?

What do optometrists do?

Sounds simple and straightforward, right?

Ask a dozen physicians and I would bet about a quarter will know what an optometrists is trained to do or is allowed or licensed to do. 

What is confusing is the natural compulsion of physicians to feel that if you're not a physician, you can only do assessment. That means only a physician can assess and treat.  But what makes optometry a bit of a different kind of profession is the extensive, albeit focused, education that recent graudates have undergone.  In recognition of this wider and deeper education, individual states in the United States have set the boundaries of optometric practice. The concept of legislative definition of scope of practice is an anathema to some physicians.

But other differences, some less obivous, further differentiatle the optometrists from the normal model of a physician.  First, optometrists see mostly healthy eyes and people. In that group or segment, the optometrist isn't preoccupied so much about finding a signficant pathology, just because it probably isn't any.  By attending mainly to healthy people, the optometrists is adept at practicing anywhere in the continuum of care. That continuum spans refraction to disease management.  However, the ophthalmologist will probably lean more to unhealthy eyes that require surgery. Like surgeons, if an ophthalmologist sees something wrong, they will recommend medicine or surgery.

Up to now, the division standing between the refracting optometrist and the ophthalmologist has been stark, but easy to comprehend. The responsibilities were clear, The authority was unmmistakable.  Optometrists detect and refer and ophthalmologists treat.

Simple then, but not so simple now.  With nearly half or more of all optometrists still detecting and referring, that proportion clashes with perception. For an ophthalmologists, that question may either be a preumptous one, or one that doesn't need asking. Either way, most opthalmologists generally view or want to confine optometry to that traditional model of detect and refer.

In summary, the traditional image of an optometrists has unfortunately hobbled the collaborative nature between the two professions. I even think that most optometrists pine for those older days past when such distinctions prevailed. For collaboration to advance, there must be some recognition that optometrists are no longer willing to be confined to the model of "detect-and-refer". In fact,  It is a double edged sword, though, because most optometrists probably are themselves struggling with the pervasive notion that they are only "detect-and-refer" optometrsits, something that doesn't smack of collaboration but of unwilling servant.  Much needs to be done still.

Reader Comments (1)

Dr. Hom and Dr. Schertzer,
Thanks for posting this. I would have to agree completely. Optometrists are held to the same standard of care as ophthalmologists. The vast majority of optometrists that I know of here in Texas have diagnostic equipment that matches that found in ophthalmology practices. Optometric education is focused on ocular conditions and the systemic conditions that are related to the eye in addition to strong backgrounds in pharmacology and systemic disease. Optometrists have become the primary care physician for eye care.

October 13, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterRichard A Driscoll, O.D.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>